![]() That "output_format_type" is what your eval case() statement would operate on to decide what output format is appropriate. Because it searches on index-time fields instead of raw events, the tstats command is faster than the stats command. The indexed fields can be from indexed data or accelerated data models. If you have to map a large number of eventtypes to a small number of eval expressions, you'll probably want to introduce a field such as "output_format_type" in your lookup table mapping various eventtypes to the output format you would like. Solution somesoni2 Revered Legend 05-16-2014 06:33 AM Following could be the option your can use: (assuming delimiter is dot '.' between field values) REX command your base search rex fieldFieldA ' (.)\. Description Use the tstats command to perform statistical queries on indexed fields in tsidx files.Provided that there is low variance in the eval expressions that you want to apply, you might want to consider simply doing this in-line (or better yet, with an EVAL- directive in nf) using a case() statement. When you run a search, Splunk will try to intelligently represent values as either a string or number, depending on what you are trying to do with them.Use map as an iterator over your result set.If you give Boolean value as an input it returns True or False corresponding to the Boolean value. If the value of fromdomain matches the regular expression, the count is updated for each suffix. Cisco IOS XR Software Discovery Protocol Format String Vulnerability. Theeval eexpression uses the match() function to compare the fromdomain to a regular expression that looks for the different suffixes in the domain. If you give number as an input it formats the number as a string. Forced Object-Graph Navigation Language (OGNL) evaluation in Apache Struts. I can think of two ways that you may be able to achieve this: Usage of Splunk EVAL Function : TOSTRING This function takes two arguments ( X and Y ) This functions converts inputs value to a string value. ![]() While this answers the initial query of sourcing an eval expression with a string from an external source, your use-case seems a more complex as it would require iteration over a result set, using different eval expressions based on a field in the result - "eventtype", if I'm not mistaken. Here return results in the in-place substitution of the whole expression with the string 1+2, which then allows eval to attribute the value 3 to the "sum" field. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |